England UK

"Eric Johnson" <erj66@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> "Mike Z. Helm" <mhelm@not.known> wrote:

>> Based on some of your other posts, anger management might not be a bad
>> thing.
>
>
> You are right, Mike.
>
> As for anger management, I know people who need it, and my occasional
> expression of less than cordiality doesn't even come close.
>
> People who need anger management are those who beat the dog because the
> wagging tail of the dog happened to hit him/her in the face as he/she was
> lying on a couch with face at dog-tail-height.
>
> It helps if the dog is less than adult and not fully trained.
>
> Other people, upon being asked to take their obviously suffering dog to
> the
> vet for castration, go out back and break the dog's neck, killing it, then
> returning to the challenging party to ask if he/she is now happy.
>
> Other people don't talk to their wife for 6 months except to say, "you
> killed my mother [via a broken heart]," when the mother died of natural
> causes at 83.
>
> Other people beat handicapped people because of desperate repairs made on
> the brakes of an auto were actually made and -paid for- at an automobile
> repair shop.
>
> These people need manger management, Mike.
>
> ASCII text posted to usenet doesn't even come close to "anger," needing to
> be managed.

If you were posting in HTML though, that would be a different matter.
That's some serious shit.