|
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:47:47 +0100, "Uno Hoo!"
<kev@dropthisbigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>"joe" <JOEPARKINchinese@BTINTERNET.COM> wrote in message
>news:MPG.1d7d5ab6cdfe3a3d9897e3@news.individual.net...
>> In article <Mr67i3gkrvEDFwEG@marshallricebin.co.uk>,
>> Marshall@marshallricebin.co.uk says...
>>> In article <deukh4$u1j$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk>, Uno Hoo!
>>> <kev@dropthisbigfoot.com> writes
>>>
>>> >And you think that relatively untrained and unvetted civilians would be
>>> >less
>>> >likely to shoot people?
>>>
>>> As I've said in a previous post, if you read any of the more
>>> authoritative studies, you'll see that in fact they are *much* less
>>> likely to.
>>>
>> You just will not believe it. No plod or politician has any faith in the
>> common public to be sensible, they will always legislate to match the
>> weakest link.
>
>The problem is that we have far too many 'weak links' in the UK at present.
>These 'common public' that you insist are sensible are to be seen on Friday
>and Saturday nights, staggering out of night clubs, drunk out of their
>minds, vomiting and urinating in the streets and throwing punches at anyone
>who they feel is 'disrespecting' them.
Lots of them are off duty police officers.
One was recently convicted of killing someone in Newcastle.
> And you want to give this bunch of
>morons guns???n
You appear to want to arm people you describe as morons.
>
> This in turn leads to the reduction of ability to think
>> for yourself and make your own decisions and be responsible for them.
>> Maybe why some people think the percentage of youths who go off the
>> rails, is rising?
>> Nanny state?
>
>Your reasoning is seriously impaired.
>
>Kev
Your love of control shows more every day.
There is a word for it that I shall not utter
>
|
|