England UK

"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8pbbh15f42drl8cvp8ef012gb37eouqo8s@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:50:41 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
> wrote:
>
> >there are a number of people in this group who think that as long as the
> >child isn't _physically_ harmed, then these perverts should be able to
> >produce, download and view as much child pornography as they wish.
>
> How about if the child is not harmed physically, mentally or in any
> other way? What exactly are we trying to prevent in that case?

The condemnation of an abhorrent practice from what is supposed to be a
decent society.
--


Steve Frazer

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steve_frazer/index.html
(updated May '05)